Big Ben wrote:azraelle wrote:Big Ben wrote:Well, Bill Clinton has the experience and would be qualified to be president, but the super delegates didn't have the gumption to do their job and nominate Hillary.
.....
"Billary" joking aside, We, as a nation, much less as human beings, ought to have left the concept of a wife as president being just a shill for her husband way back in the dark ages. Hillary would have served with her own brand of distinction quite well, thank you, even if her philandering cigar-toting half-assed excuse for a husband had croaked on the campaign trail (as a matter of fact, she probably would have gotten the nomination had that happened!).
If you can't rationally discuss and dissect a person on his OR HER merits as a human being, regardless of gender, then you ought to at least find another forum to spout your bigoted innuendo.
Ah yes, when someone says something you don't like, even though it's been said thousands of times before, you play the bigot name-calling card. Guess you learned your lessons well from the democrats in your state. Have it your way - be a crybaby and sit out the election.
I notice you didn't manage to intelligently address the ACTUAL SUBJECT. Was that because you are incapable of rationally defending your prejudices, or because you figured criticizing my use of the word "bigot" would get you more sympathy?
